1996: The Ivan Milat Verdict: Seven Murders, Life Without Parole

Ivan Robert Marko Milat, known as the Backpacker Murderer, was found guilty on 27 July 1996 of seven counts of murder, the worst serial killing case in Australian history. His victims, mostly young backpackers travelling the Hume Highway between Sydney and Melbourne between 1989 and 1992, were lured under the pretence of a lift before being taken into the Belanglo State Forest in New South Wales and murdered.

Milat was sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of parole and spent 25 years appealing his sentence. Police remained confident he was responsible for more killings than those proven at trial. He died in custody on 27 October 2019.

The <a href='https://darkstories.com.au/belanglo-state-forest-ivan-milat/' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer'>Ivan Milat</a> Verdict: Seven Murders, Life Without Parole
Belanglo State Forest

⬅ See all events from 27 July

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Matthew Clark: The Cowardly Footpad Who Turned Killer

Matthew Clark is the kind of figure who makes true crime so unsettling: not a mastermind, not a hardened villain, but a lazy, cowardly young man whose small vices compound into something monstrous. Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals introduces him as a creature formed entirely from the worst impulses of low life; idle, drunk, driven by lust, and too timid to commit even the crimes he plans.

Born in St. Albans to parents of modest means, Clark squanders every opportunity placed before him. Dismissed from a gentleman’s household for sheer incorrigibility, he drifts into roadside robbery on the heaths outside London; not from ambition, but because honest labour feels harder than the risk of the noose.

The Georgian world Clark inhabits is one where cowardice and desperation make a volatile combination, and the roads between country and city are lined with gallows that watch every traveller pass. Hear the full account read aloud from Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals; let this dark voice from nearly three centuries ago carry you into Matthew Clark’s story.

Click the RSS feed link below to subscribe and get new episodes the moment they drop.

Subscribe via RSS

Dark Lexicon: Old words. Dark meaning.

The past speaks its own dialect; here is what to listen for in this episode.

Footpad: a robber who works on foot, as opposed to a highwayman who attacks from horseback. The footpad was considered the lowest and most contemptible breed of thief; lacking even the theatrical swagger of the mounted robber, he was simply a desperate figure lurking in hedgerows and waiting for someone weaker to come along.

Meaner sort: nothing to do with cruelty here. In eighteenth century usage, ‘mean’ referred to lowly social standing or humble circumstances. The ‘meaner sort’ were the poor and labouring classes; the ones Georgian writers worried most about when it came to moral corruption.

Passengers: today we think of someone sitting in a vehicle, but in this era a passenger was simply anyone passing along a road on foot, horseback, or in a coach. Every passenger on a lonely heath was a potential victim; every stretch of road between towns was a hunting ground.

Junketting: feasting, merrymaking, carousing. The word ‘junket’ still survives in modern English, usually meaning a lavish trip at someone else’s expense, but in Clark’s day it was rawer and more physical: drinking bouts, dancing, and the reckless spending of stolen money on fleeting pleasures.

The matrimonial maggot bit his brain: a wonderfully vivid eighteenth century expression. A ‘maggot’ in this context was a whim or a sudden foolish fancy; the image is of a parasitic idea burrowing into a person’s thoughts and driving them to irrational action. When the matrimonial maggot bit Clark, it meant the notion of marriage seized hold of him like a fever.

Timorous: fearful, easily frightened. Still in use today but far less common, it perfectly captures Clark’s defining trait: a man who plans violence but whose own cowardice keeps undoing him, at least until desperation finally overwhelms his fear.

Jocose: playful, humorous, given to joking. The word carries a warmth and ease that makes its use in this story deeply chilling; Clark sits laughing and flirting with a woman he is already planning to kill.

Made a shift: managed with difficulty, barely succeeded. In this account, the phrase describes a dying woman’s final desperate effort; she ‘made a shift to mutter his name,’ meaning she barely managed to speak it through a wound that should have silenced her entirely.

About This Series

Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals is one of the earliest works of true crime writing in the English language, nearly 300 years old, covering murderers, thieves, highwaymen, forgers, coiners and worse.

The book is entirely in the public domain and every word of it can be read today for free. But if you would rather listen, this podcast does exactly that: one criminal at a time, every week, read aloud.

True crime was not invented by podcasts or streaming services. Eighteenth century readers were just as fascinated by outlaws and killers as we are today. They just consumed their dark stories by candlelight.

The voice you hear is David Dark: crime researcher, theatre script writer, producer of live immersive experiences, and audiobook narrator and voice artist. This podcast uses an AI voice model trained on David’s own voice, built using the maximum available training data to faithfully represent how he actually sounds. To hear David’s real voice in human generated form, visit him on Audible, Online Stage, Voices of Today, Spoken Realms, and Internet Archive.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Jane Griffin: The Mistress Who Turned a Knife on Her Maid

Jane Griffin is a woman of sharp wit, good reputation and a violent temper she cannot govern. As Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals tells it, she keeps a busy inn in Smithfield with her husband, drawing customers with her charm and driving them away with her rages; a figure who belongs as much to the annals of true crime as to any cautionary sermon.

She is well-bred, well-spoken and genuinely kind when calm; yet anger moves through her like weather, sudden and ungovernable. The domestic world she has built is real and prosperous, but it sits on a fault line that runs straight through her own character.

In the close quarters of a Georgian inn, temper and proximity are a volatile combination, and the question is never whether a spark will fall but when.

Hear the full account of Jane Griffin read aloud from Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals; let this voice carry the weight of a story that has waited nearly three centuries to reach your ears.

 

 

Click the RSS feed link below to subscribe and get new episodes the moment they drop.

Subscribe via RSS

Dark Lexicon: Old words. Dark meaning.

The past speaks its own dialect; here is what to listen for in this episode.

Malice prepense: This is the old legal term for premeditated ill intent; deliberate, thought-out malice as opposed to a spur-of-the-moment act. In court it carried enormous weight: proving malice prepense could mean the difference between a lesser charge and a capital conviction. Today we would say ‘premeditated’ or ‘aforethought,’ but the older phrase has a colder ring to it, as if the law itself is whispering that it already knows what you were thinking.

Stays: Not pauses or delays; in this context, stays are the rigid, boned corset worn tight around a woman’s torso. They were everyday armour in Georgian England, laced and stiffened to shape the body. When the text notes that the maid’s stays happened to be ‘unluckily open,’ it means the one piece of clothing that might have stopped a blade was unfastened at exactly the wrong moment.

Ordinary of Newgate: The Ordinary was the prison chaplain assigned to Newgate, London’s most notorious gaol. His duties went far beyond spiritual comfort: he attended the condemned in their final days, recorded their confessions, and often published pamphlets about their lives and crimes for a hungry public. The Ordinary was part priest, part journalist, and part spectacle-maker.

High words: Today we might say a ‘heated argument’ or ‘shouting match.’ In eighteenth century usage, ‘high words’ meant angry, raised voices exchanged between people in a dispute. It sounds almost polite now, but at the time it signalled a confrontation that had moved past reason.

Taxed her with: Nothing to do with money. To ‘tax’ someone in this period meant to accuse them, to lay blame at their feet. It carried a bluntness that the word ‘accused’ sometimes softens; to tax someone was to challenge them directly and expect an answer.

Aspersed: To asperse someone was to spread false or damaging stories about them; to smear their name. We still have the noun ‘aspersion’ in phrases like ‘casting aspersions,’ but the verb itself has all but vanished. Jane Griffin uses the word to describe those who slandered her during her imprisonment, adding cruelty to an already crushing situation.

Temporal concerns: This does not mean time. ‘Temporal’ here means worldly, earthly; the practical matters of money, property and livelihood as opposed to the spiritual welfare of the soul. When Jane begs her husband to attend to his temporal concerns, she is telling him to keep the business alive and the family fed after she is gone.

 

About This Series

Lives of the Most Remarkable Criminals is one of the earliest works of true crime writing in the English language, nearly 300 years old, covering murderers, thieves, highwaymen, forgers, coiners and worse.

The book is entirely in the public domain and every word of it can be read today for free. But if you would rather listen, this podcast does exactly that: one criminal at a time, every week, read aloud.

True crime was not invented by podcasts or streaming services. Eighteenth century readers were just as fascinated by outlaws and killers as we are today. They just consumed their dark stories by candlelight.

The voice you hear is David Dark; crime researcher, theatre script writer, producer of live immersive experiences, and audiobook narrator and voice artist. This podcast uses an AI voice model trained on David’s own voice, built using the maximum available training data to faithfully represent how he actually sounds. To hear David’s real voice in human-generated form, visit him on Audible, Online Stage, Voices of Today, Spoken Realms, and Internet Archive.

Spread the word on your favourite platform!

Belle Not of The Ball – The Female Serial Killer

Do female serial killers exist? If you’ve watched your fair share of Crime Documentaries and you know your True Crime Stories, you could easily be forgiven for thinking that the serial killing career is a purely male domain. Is it true or false? How can we prove it? So, this week, we delved deep into the history books to uncover the answer, and the history books were unequivocal in their response to the question: do female serial killers indeed exist?

By way of example and to make the case, let’s begin by telling the true crime story of a widower(twice over) named Belle Gunness, her husband(s), her male acquaintances, her children, and her mysterious ending.

It all starts innocently enough. We meet Belle in the year of her birth in 1859 in Norway. At the age of 24, she moves to the new world with her father and marries her first husband in the year 1884. In the years to come, she would give birth to four children and adopt a fifth child. At this point, her tale seems no different to anyone else of the era.

Belle and Children

Although she did have one problem – and no, it was not her husband – at least not yet. But she was inflicted with a most unfortunate curse. Through acts of God or pure lousy luck, her properties tended to be on the extremely flammable side.

The couple owned a candy store that mysteriously burnt down to the ground, and only a few short years later, the home they had built together over 15 years also suddenly turned into ash. Her grief was considerably eased by her gradual attainment of the American Dream, by being well protected from loss in the form of lucrative insurance payouts.

Especially so, in 1900, when her first husband tragically died on a particularly inauspicious day. It was the one day in which a coincidental overlap in the dates between an expiring life insurance policy and a new life insurance policy was to take effect.

She claimed he had come home with a headache, went for a lie-down, and later found him dead. The coroner, interestingly enough, initially ruled a verdict of strychnine poisoning, but Gunness’s doctor overruled the decision and claimed heart failure was the cause. It was a windfall for the grieving widow. The unexpected blessing from the inheritance in the form of two life insurance payouts for her husband’s life eased her pains and even put her on a sound financial footing.

It added to the fortune she had already won after the tragic deaths of two of the couple’s children, Caroline and Axel. They had already died in infancy of acute colitis, which, although a common way for children to die at the time, also had similar symptoms to various forms of poisoning – vomiting, abdominal pain, fever, and so on. Fortunately for Belle, both baby’s lives were insured, and the insurance company dutifully paid out the handsome bounties.

After all this tragedy, somehow, Belle collected her life back together, and with the aid of the growing pile of insurance money, she bought a 40-acre property. Yet the curse that she laboured under was not done with her yet. Before long, that property also burnt down, leading to yet another insurance claim. Once again, fate forced her to rebuild her life and her home, but at least she could restore the property in the manner she preferred.

Onlookers at the Belle Farm

Life gradually got better, and in 1902, she met and married her 2nd husband, Peter Gunness, who brought with him two daughters from a previous marriage. Tragically, only one week into the marriage, Peter’s 7-month-old daughter died unexpectedly. Peter, perhaps suspecting something was not quite right about the death, sent his 2nd daughter away to live with relatives. Destiny would prove that this was the only child to live with Belle, who would survive into adulthood.

Unfortunately for her second husband, Peter, tragedy struck a cruel fate at his expense. His misfortune was to be hit in the head by a sausage grinding machine that fell from a high shelf, or so the official story went. The coroner indicated that there appeared to be some evidence of strychnine poisoning, to which Belle resorted to the ultimate feminine weapon. Not poison – but tears, which few men can resist. Again, she escaped with the benefit of the doubt and received yet another lucrative life insurance payout.

In 1906, her adopted daughter Jennie mysteriously disappeared, but Belle reassured anyone who asked after her that she had been sent away to a finishing school.

From that point onward to her mysterious ending in 1908, she would go in search of a new husband, placing ads in far-off newspapers seeking to lure wealthy men with her vast fortune.

“Personal—comely widow who owns a large farm in one of the finest districts in La Porte County, Indiana, desires to make the acquaintance of a gentleman equally well provided, with the view of joining fortunes. No replies by letter are considered unless the sender is willing to follow the answer with a personal visit. Triflers need not apply.”

Dozens of potential suitors would write and visit her. She received up to 8 letters daily and often went for carriage rides with well-to-do strangers. On such occasions, she would wear her most beautiful clothing, yet she never was able to settle down with any of them.

She would convince some of these men to sell their assets or give her gifts of money to discharge her debts so that they may be more wholly joined. Some of them disappeared from the face of the earth. Often, the missing men were instructed to tell no one of their budding romance. Sometimes, though, relatives would connect the dots and come looking for their lost ones at Belle’s door. Generally, she would claim she either didn’t know where they were or they had returned to their hometowns without so much as writing her a letter.

In December of 1907, Andrew Helgelien received a letter from Belle with the line, “Come prepared to stay forever.” It was a prophecy destined to come true as he duly emptied his bank accounts, moved to Belle’s farm, and his family never to see or hear from him again.

Buried Bodies Belle Farm

In 1908, Belle’s curse would strike one more time with fatal consequences for herself. Once again, her house burnt down, but in this instance, there would be no insurance claim. The victims of the fire were Belle’s three remaining children and the remains of a headless woman presumed to be Belle.

It perplexed the authorities, who initially believed a tragedy had occurred. But further investigation of the property revealed some disturbing findings. Amongst several shallow graves, the dismembered remains of at least 11 people were discovered, including those of Jennie, Belle’s adopted daughter, whom everyone believed to be finishing school.

Ominously, numerous body parts stored in sacks appeared to be reused as food for the pigs due to their proximity to the hog pen. With the number of men reported missing in the area reaching 25-30 men, Belle’s speculative kill count is considered likely to exceed 40 victims.

And how is one to explain the mystery of the headless corpse? Without the head of the victim, dental records could not be called on to identify the victim as Belle. Was Belle killed in the fire? Or did she arrange for a body double to take her place? Did she successfully fake her death before the authorities caught up with her?

For many years to come, there would be numerous reports of Belle sightings; sometimes, she was hiding in the woods near her home, other times on shopping trips in Chicago or riding in a train carriage headed to New York, but nothing ever came of these reports.

Whether she died in the fire that night or not, Belle Gunness is an obvious example that predators come in all shapes and sizes. Despite some suspicions that occasionally swirled around her, she was never directly challenged or arrested and, in the end, may have successfully orchestrated her escape from ultimate justice by faking her death.

Is she an example of how successful female serial killers can be? Are female serial killers only much better at covering their tracks than their male counterparts, and if that is true, then, therefore, we know less about them because of their high success rate?

Belle Gunness

After all, many of the stories on our walking tours contain women perpetrators. The Sydney Razor Gang tour is a prime example of a tour that is almost an ode to strong women such as Tilly Devine and Kate Leigh, who ran the rival gangs in Sydney throughout the 1920s and 1930s.

Further analysis of the historical record reveals countless feminine serial killer examples with extremely high body counts. The stories are incredible, and we’ll be sure to write further on these women in posts to come.

In the meantime, let us know if you’d like to hear more about serial killers from the past or more on Australia’s Crime History specifically. Or else, join us on tour sometime and take a walk on the dark side, and return to the scenes of the crimes, on any of these true-crime walking tours:-

Discuss On Substack

Spread the word on your favourite platform!
On This Day in True Crime History
1794·The First Free Settler Murdered in the Colony: Hanged at Sydney for a Parramatta Stabbing
1826·The Gun That Misfired Twice: Three Bushrangers Hanged Outside Sydney
1873·A Tearful Confession in Custody Cracked the Case: Two Men Hanged at Perth Gaol for Eating their Victim
1889·He Called It an Accident. The Jury Called It Murder: Robert Landells Hanged at Melbourne Gaol
1907·A Doctor Fooled Twice: Martha Rendell and the Second Child to Die of Diphtheria
2002·Shot Dead in His Own Bed: A Melbourne Gangland Killing Blamed on a Friend
More Crime On This Day →

Subscribe to Dark Stories

True crime stories, dark history and tour news, straight to your inbox.